BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed May 19, 2023 · 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

HB2502

child support; date of pregnancy

BLAME HOBBS!

Family

THE CONTEXT: A court is authorized to order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child to pay an amount reasonable and necessary to support the child in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, maintenance or child support, regardless of marital misconduct. Statute requires the Arizona Supreme Court to establish guidelines for determining the proper amount of child support (Guidelines) and review them at least once every four years.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would allow a court, when applicable, to consider the retroactive application of child support to the date on which a pregnancy was positively confirmed by a licensed health care professional, specifies that, in directing the amount of past child support from the date of a positive pregnancy test confirmed by a licensed health care professional, the court must take into account any amount of temporary or voluntary support that has been paid from and after the date of the positive pregnancy test, and make technical and conforming changes.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to give Arizonans and public officials a defined option for child support under state law. It would allow a court, when applicable, to consider the retroactive application of child support to the date on which a pregnancy was positively confirmed by a licensed health care professional, and would also specifies that, in directing the amount of past child support from the date of a positive pregnancy test confirmed by a licensed health care professional, the court must take into account any amount of temporary or voluntary support that has been paid from and after the date of the positive pregnancy test, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

SB1410

school districts; parent complaints; reporting

2023 · Education

HB2786

teacher training; parental notification; requirements

2023 · Education

HB2530

substance exposure; pregnant women; neglect

2023 · Family

SB1331

schools; parents; firearm possession

2023 · Public safety

SB1005

unjustified actions; parental rights

2023 · Family

HB2427

domestic violence; pregnant victim; sentencing

2023 · Public safety