Vetoed May 19, 2023 · 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session
SB1011
municipalities; partisan elections
BLAME HOBBS!
THE CONTEXT: City and town elections are conducted in the same manner as county officer elections, except that the returns shall be made to the clerk of the city or town, and the governing body of the city or town shall canvass the returns, declare the result and issue the certificates of the election ( A. R.
WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would state that a city or town may conduct a candidate election as follows: a) With the candidate's political party registration indicated on the ballot; or b) Without the candidate's political party registration indicated on the ballot, require the municipal offices in a partisan election to be included on a partisan ballot, and contains a delayed effective date of January 1st,.
WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to make election administration and accountability rules for municipalities more definite. It would state that a city or town may conduct a candidate election as follows: a) With the candidate's political party registration indicated on the ballot; or b) Without the candidate's political party registration indicated on the ballot, and would also require the municipal offices in a partisan election to be included on a partisan ballot, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.
Related vetoes
SB1095
early ballot envelope; notice
2023 · Elections
SB1246
election; transportation tax; Maricopa County
2023 · Elections
SB1332
cast vote record; public records
2023 · Elections
SB1471
ballot tabulation; hand count comparison
2023 · Elections
SB1595
early ballots; identification; tabulation
2023 · Elections
SB1598
federal candidates; observers; elections
2023 · Elections