BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed April 12, 2023 · 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

SB1251

working animals; restrictions; prohibition

BLAME HOBBS!

Government & transparency

THE CONTEXT: Every city and town's legislative body must adopt a comprehensive general plan that includes goals, policies and land use and circulation elements ( A. R.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would prohibit a city, town or county from enacting any ordinance, resolution or policy that prohibits or unduly restricts a person from using a working animal in lawful commerce for an animal enterprise, exempt the following from this prohibition: a) municipal or county zoning ordinances; b) municipal or county ordinances or resolutions enacted relating to public health, public safety, noise or animal cruelty; or c) any other state law relating to animal care, animal cruelty, noise, public health or public safety, and define animal enterprise as a rodeo or any agricultural activities conducted on any facility to produce crops, livestock, poultry, livestock products or poultry products or for agritourism.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to set a clear legal boundary for working animals instead of leaving the conduct unaddressed. It would prohibit a city, town or county from enacting any ordinance, resolution or policy that prohibits or unduly restricts a person from using a working animal in lawful commerce for an animal enterprise, and would also exempt the following from this prohibition: a) municipal or county zoning ordinances; b) municipal or county ordinances or resolutions enacted relating to public health, public safety, noise or animal cruelty; or c) any other state law relating to animal care, animal cruelty, noise, public health or public safety, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

SB1106

social media platforms; standards; notification

2023 · Government & transparency

SB1175

registrations; observers; counting procedures; verification

2023 · Government & transparency

SB1301

misconduct investigations; time limit; applicability

2023 · Government & transparency

SB1332

cast vote record; public records

2023 · Elections

SB1408

electronic applications; human smuggling

2023 · Government & transparency

SB1435

attorney licensing; supreme court

2023 · Government & transparency