BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed April 16, 2024 · 56th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

SB1509

informed consent; signatures

BLAME HOBBS!

Government & transparency

THE CONTEXT: A physician is a Doctor of Medicine who is licensed under the Arizona Medical Board ( A. R.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would requires, except in an emergency, informed consent for a surgical procedure obtained by a licensed physician, NP or PA to include the following dated signatures as required by the health care facility's policies, if applicable: a) the health professional performing the surgical procedure; b) the patient or the patient's surrogate decision maker; and c) a witness and require a witness to verify on the document that the patient or the patient's surrogate decision maker directly indicated to the witness that the patient intended to consent to the surgical procedure if a patient or patient's surrogate decision maker is physically unable to sign or mark an informed consent.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to give patients a defined set of rights and a clear informed-consent standard. It would requires, except in an emergency, informed consent for a surgical procedure obtained by a licensed physician, NP or PA to include the following dated signatures as required by the health care facility's policies, if applicable: a) the health professional performing the surgical procedure; b) the patient or the patient's surrogate decision maker; and c) a witness, and would also require a witness to verify on the document that the patient or the patient's surrogate decision maker directly indicated to the witness that the patient intended to consent to the surgical procedure if a patient or patient's surrogate decision maker is physically unable to sign or mark an informed consent, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2376

federal government; land acquisition; consent

2024 · Housing & property

HB2573

use fuel dispenser labels; penalties

2024 · Government & transparency

HB2735

ABOR; course approval; accounting system

2024 · Government & transparency

SB1155

lifetime probation; sexual offenses; termination

2024 · Government & transparency

SB1435

public entity liability; sexual offenses

2024 · Government & transparency

SB1511

insurance; gender surgeries; documentation; reports

2024 · Government & transparency