BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed May 12, 2025 · 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

HB2233

corporation commission; lobbying; prohibition

BLAME HOBBS!

Government & transparency

THE CONTEXT: The Arizona Corporation Commission has the power to prescribe just and reasonable rates and charges for services provided by public service corporations within the state. The Commission may prescribe rules, regulations and orders which govern how public service corporations transact their business.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would prohibit the Commission, its staff and lobbyists from advocating for or against federal or state legislation, regulations or rules before the Commission does the following: a) takes a majority vote at a publicly noticed meeting; and b) publishes the Commission's position on their website and a legislative information system or comparable system used by the Legislature or the Governor's Regulatory Review Council, allow the Attorney General to investigate whether the commission has violated these requirements upon the request of one or more members of the Legislature, and state if the Commission or a Commissioner is in violation of the measure, they are subject to a civil penalty of $500 for each instance of noncompliance.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to give the people who rely on the rule clearer information and a defined reporting process. It would prohibit the Commission, its staff and lobbyists from advocating for or against federal or state legislation, regulations or rules before the Commission does the following: a) takes a majority vote at a publicly noticed meeting; and b) publishes the Commission's position on their website and a legislative information system or comparable system used by the Legislature or the Governor's Regulatory Review Council, and would also allow the Attorney General to investigate whether the commission has violated these requirements upon the request of one or more members of the Legislature, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2324

forfeiture; digital assets; reserve fund

2025 · Government & transparency

SB1019

photo enforcement systems; prohibition

2025 · Government & transparency

SB1514

employer-employee arbitration; contract; disputes

2025 · Government & transparency

HB2948

amusements; 2025-2026

2025 · Government & transparency

HB2955

human services; 2025-2026

2025 · Government & transparency

HB2957

local government; 2025-2026

2025 · Government & transparency