BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed May 12, 2025 · 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

SB1091

school districts; bonds; overrides; ballots

BLAME HOBBS!

ElectionsEducation

THE CONTEXT: A school district governing board seeking to exceed its aggregate budget limit must call an election for a budget override. If an election is called to continue to exceed the school district's budget and the proposed budget override will be fully funded by a continuation of secondary property taxes, the ballot must include prescribed information, including: 1) the length of time the budget override will be continued; 2) a statement that the budget override continuation will be entirely funded by secondary property taxes; 3) a statement that monies raised by continuing the budget override are not subject to co...

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would includes, in the ballot for an election to continue a school district budget override, an SSA budget override or a school district's authority to issue and sell bonds at the same rate as was previously authorized in an election, a statement that provides the: a) estimated dollar amount per $100 of net assessed valuation that secondary property taxes will be reduced by without the budget override or bond continuation; and b) date on which the reduction will begin.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to make election administration and accountability rules for school districts more definite. It would includes, in the ballot for an election to continue a school district budget override, an SSA budget override or a school district's authority to issue and sell bonds at the same rate as was previously authorized in an election, a statement that provides the: a) estimated dollar amount per $100 of net assessed valuation that secondary property taxes will be reduced by without the budget override or bond continuation; and b) date on which the reduction will begin, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

SB1441

school districts; partisan elections

2025 · Elections

HB4033

school bonding; ballot language

2026 · Elections

SB1097

school districts; partisan elections

2024 · Elections

SB1001

early ballots; identification; tabulation

2025 · Elections

HB2954

higher education; 2025-2026

2025 · Education

HB2956

K-12 education; 2025-2026

2025 · Education