BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed May 12, 2025 · 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

SB1586

gender transition procedures; provider liability

BLAME HOBBS!

Healthcare

THE CONTEXT: Laws 2022, Chapter 104 made it illegal for a physician to perform irreversible gender reassignment surgery on minors. Irreversible gender reassignment surgery is a medical procedure performed for the purpose of assisting an individual with a gender transition, including any of the following: 1) penectomy, orchiectomy, vaginoplasty, clitoroplasty or vulvoplasty for biologically male patients or hysterectomy or ovariectomy for biologically female patients; 2) metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, vaginectomy, scrotoplasty or implantation of erection or testicular prostheses for biologically female patients; or 3) augme...

WHAT THE BILL DID: of assisting an individual with a gender transition, including any of the following: 1) penectomy, orchiectomy, vaginoplasty, clitoroplasty or vulvoplasty for biologically male patients or hysterectomy or ovariectomy for biologically female patients; 2) metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, vaginectomy, scrotoplasty or implantation of erection or testicular prostheses for biologically female patients; or 3) augmentation mammoplasty for biologically male patients and subcutaneous mastectomy for female patients ( A. R.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to give patients a defined set of rights and a clear informed-consent standard. It would make a healthcare professional or physician who provides or has provided a minor with a gender transition procedure strictly and personally liable for all costs associated with subsequent detransition procedures within 25 years after the gender transition procedure, and would also allow a person who undergoes a detransition procedure to bring a civil action before they reach 26 years old against a healthcare professional or physician for: a) the real value of the costs of any detransition procedure; b) any other appropriate relief; and c) attorney fees and costs, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2953

health care; 2025-2026

2025 · Healthcare

HB2966

health care; FY2026

2025 · Healthcare

SB1600

patient rights; health care services

2025 · Healthcare

SB1268

hospitals; patient immigration status; reporting

2025 · Border & immigration

HB2449

AHCCCS; enrollment verification; presumptive eligibility

2025 · Healthcare

HB2670

health education; fetal development instruction

2025 · Education