BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed April 13, 2026 · 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

HB2167

attorney general; nuisance action; damages

BLAME HOBBS!

Government & transparency

THE CONTEXT: Current law allows the county attorney, the Attorney General or the city attorney to bring an action in superior court to abate, enjoin and prevent public nuisance. It is a public nuisance for anything: 1) to be injurious to health, indecent, offensive to the senses or an obstruction to the free use of property that interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property by an entire community or neighborhood or by a considerable number of persons; and 2) to unlawfully obstruct the free passage or use, in the customary manner, of any navigable lake, river, bay, stream, canal or basin, or any public park...

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would designate the AG as liable for damages to any person who is injured, if the AG files a public nuisance action or consumer fraud action, if: a; the nuisance or fraud action is: i; dismissed by the court; or ii; found to not have merit; and b; the AG either: i; knew or should have known that the nuisance or fraud action lacked sufficient legal or factual basis; or ii; publicized the filing of the nuisance or fraud action, mandate damages awarded pursuant to this act include reasonable attorney fees and the costs of litigation, and allow damages to include lost sales and business, lost profits and loss in business value.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to make the government process for attorney general more definite and accountable. It would designate the AG as liable for damages to any person who is injured, if the AG files a public nuisance action or consumer fraud action, if: a. the nuisance or fraud action is: i. dismissed by the court; or ii. found to not have merit; and b. the AG either: i. knew or should have known that the nuisance or fraud action lacked sufficient legal or factual basis; or ii. publicized the filing of the nuisance or fraud action, and would also mandate damages awarded pursuant to this act include reasonable attorney fees and the costs of litigation, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2010

digital goods; seller's requirements; enforcement

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2086

vaccination mandates; masks; prohibition

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2113

public service corporation; rates; intervenor

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2118

mobile food vendors; licensure

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2133

sexual material; consent; synthetic depiction

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2140

treasurer; investment; bullion

2026 · Government & transparency