BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed June 19, 2026 · 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

HB2745

legislative subpoena; perjury; refusal; contempt

BLAME HOBBS!

Government & transparency

THE CONTEXT: A legislative subpoena may be issued by the Senate President, Speaker of the House of Representatives (House) or any chairperson of a committee. For a subpoena to be sufficient, the subpoena must: 1) state whether the proceeding is before the Senate, House or a legislative committee; 2) be addressed to the witness; 3) contain the time and place that the attendance of the witness is required; and 4) be signed by the presiding officer of a committee chairman.

WHAT THE BILL DID: Allows a legislative committee to hold a witness in contempt for neglecting to obey a legislative subpoena, if an order of contempt is issued for failure to comply with the subpoena after the witness is given an opportunity for a hearing to present evidence as to why the witness is not in contempt.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to give the people who rely on the rule clearer information and a defined reporting process. It would add that a witness may be committed to contempt if: a) after the witness is given notice and opportunity, at the discretion of the chairperson, for a hearing to present evidence to show cause as to why the witness is not in contempt; and b) the Senate President, Speaker of the House or any committee chairperson issues an order of contempt that finds the witness had knowledge of the subpoena, the ability to comply with the subpoena and failed to comply with the subpoena, and would also stipulate that a witness may be committed to contempt only by the prescribed procedures, unless another procedure is provided by the rules of either house of the Legislature, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2010

digital goods; seller's requirements; enforcement

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2086

vaccination mandates; masks; prohibition

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2113

public service corporation; rates; intervenor

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2118

mobile food vendors; licensure

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2133

sexual material; consent; synthetic depiction

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2140

treasurer; investment; bullion

2026 · Government & transparency