BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed March 12, 2026 · 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

HB4115

ballot measures; circulators; revenue; disclosure.

BLAME HOBBS!

ElectionsTaxes & economy

THE CONTEXT: Currently, statute outlines that an initiative petition circulator must declare whether they are a paid or a volunteering circulator by checking the appropriate line on the petition prior to circulating the petition for signatures. Signatures obtained by a circulator who does not check the petition declaring they are a paid circulator or a volunteer are void and not counted.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would require a paid circulator, on approaching a potential petition signer, to verbally disclose: a; the state in which the paid circulator legally resides; and b; that the circulator is a paid circulator, require a paid circulator to wear a badge that is clearly visible and displays the following information: a; that the circulator is a paid circulator; and b; the state in which the paid circulator legally resides, and strikes statewide from statute outlining the standard of review of initiative petitions to reflect expanded applicability to all initiative and referendum measures, including those limited to municipalities and counties.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to turn the Legislature's standard for ballot measures into an enforceable rule. It would require a paid circulator, on approaching a potential petition signer, to verbally disclose: a. the state in which the paid circulator legally resides; and b. that the circulator is a paid circulator, and would also require a paid circulator to wear a badge that is clearly visible and displays the following information: a. that the circulator is a paid circulator; and b. the state in which the paid circulator legally resides, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

SB1246

election; transportation tax; Maricopa County

2023 · Elections

HB2015

budget procedures; late filing penalty

2026 · Taxes & economy

HB2460

business property; theft; penalties; prohibition

2026 · Taxes & economy

HB2873

municipalities; referendum petitions; withdrawal

2026 · Elections

SB1038

cast vote record; public record

2026 · Elections

SB1040

voter registration rolls; internet access

2026 · Elections