SB1013

THE CONTEXT: The Arizona Constitution prohibits the state from granting preferential treatment or discriminating on the basis of sex, race, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, education or contracting. This prohibition does not include qualifications based on sex that are reasonable and necessary, actions to establish or maintain federal programs that would otherwise result in a loss of federal money or invalidate court orders and consent decrees ( Article II 36, Const.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would prohibit Arizona or a political subdivision from doing any of the following: a; establishing any policies or practices that require the person to be hired based on anything other than the person's merit; or b; manipulating or influencing the composition of employees with reference to race, ethnicity, sex or national origin except to ensure color-blind and race-neutral hiring, permits the Attorney General, county attorney or any other person to file for declaratory relief, injunctive relief or damages for any violation of this legislation, and stipulate that the prevailing party is entitled to costs and reasonable attorney fees.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to set a clear legal boundary for public employees instead of leaving the conduct unaddressed. It would prohibit Arizona or a political subdivision from doing any of the following: a. establishing any policies or practices that require the person to be hired based on anything other than the person's merit; or b. manipulating or influencing the composition of employees with reference to race, ethnicity, sex or national origin except to ensure color-blind and race-neutral hiring, and would also permits the Attorney General, county attorney or any other person to file for declaratory relief, injunctive relief or damages for any violation of this legislation, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.