Vetoed June 19, 2026 · 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session
SB1018
foreign law; sharia law; prohibition
BLAME HOBBS!
THE CONTEXT: Currently, statute defines foreign law as any law, rule or legal code or system other than the Constitution, laws and ratified treaties of the U. S.
WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would expand the meaning of foreign law by adding sharia law, state that foreign law includes a foreign, religious or cultural law, custom or practice that allows, condones or excuses: a; the honor killing of a person or honor-based violence; b; a forced or coerced marriage; c; a marriage involving a minor that violates a law in this state; d; female genital mutilation or cutting; e; the physical punishment of a minor that constitutes abuse pursuant to the laws of Arizona; f; domestic violence or spousal abuse that is justified by cultural, religious or family authority; g; restricting a person's liberty or rights if based on gender, religion or family honor; h; denying a person equal protection or due process; i; polygamy where prohibited by the laws of Arizona; or j; any conduct that violates Arizona criminal law, and make technical and conforming changes.
WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to make the government process for foreign law more definite and accountable. It would expand the meaning of foreign law by adding sharia law, and would also state that foreign law includes a foreign, religious or cultural law, custom or practice that allows, condones or excuses: a. the honor killing of a person or honor-based violence; b. a forced or coerced marriage; c. a marriage involving a minor that violates a law in this state; d. female genital mutilation or cutting; e. the physical punishment of a minor that constitutes abuse pursuant to the laws of Arizona; f. domestic violence or spousal abuse that is justified by cultural, religious or family authority; g. restricting a person's liberty or rights if based on gender, religion or family honor; h. denying a person equal protection or due process; i. polygamy where prohibited by the laws of Arizona; or j. any conduct that violates Arizona criminal law, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.
Related vetoes
HB2010
digital goods; seller's requirements; enforcement
2026 · Government & transparency
HB2086
vaccination mandates; masks; prohibition
2026 · Government & transparency
HB2113
public service corporation; rates; intervenor
2026 · Government & transparency
HB2118
mobile food vendors; licensure
2026 · Government & transparency
HB2133
sexual material; consent; synthetic depiction
2026 · Government & transparency
HB2140
treasurer; investment; bullion
2026 · Government & transparency