BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed June 19, 2026 · 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

SB1039

attorney discipline investigations; costs

BLAME HOBBS!

Government & transparency

THE CONTEXT: The Supreme Court of Arizona is responsible for and establishes rules regarding the regulation of the practice of law in Arizona. This includes establishing the State Bar of Arizona, regulating its members and, if needed, outlines a process for the State Bar to discipline an attorney for unprofessional conduct or for violating court rules ( Supreme Court of Arizona ).

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would includes loss of earnings in the damages that must be paid to an attorney by the State Bar of Arizona if he prevails in an attorney discipline matter and allows him to file a claim against the State Bar if he suffers damage to his reputation, specifies that loss of earnings is calculated during the time-period that covers all stages of the investigation, discipline process, court litigation and appeals process, and allow the prevailing attorney to file a claim against the State Bar if he suffered damage to his reputation.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to make the government process for attorney discipline investigations more definite and accountable. It would includes loss of earnings in the damages that must be paid to an attorney by the State Bar of Arizona if he prevails in an attorney discipline matter and allows him to file a claim against the State Bar if he suffers damage to his reputation, and would also specifies that loss of earnings is calculated during the time-period that covers all stages of the investigation, discipline process, court litigation and appeals process, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2010

digital goods; seller's requirements; enforcement

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2086

vaccination mandates; masks; prohibition

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2113

public service corporation; rates; intervenor

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2118

mobile food vendors; licensure

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2133

sexual material; consent; synthetic depiction

2026 · Government & transparency

HB2140

treasurer; investment; bullion

2026 · Government & transparency