BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed June 19, 2026 · 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

SB1221

tax laws; interpretation; application; hearing

BLAME HOBBS!

Taxes & economy

THE CONTEXT: DOR cannot retroactively apply any newly enacted law retroactively or in a way which would penalize a taxpayer in compliance with previous law unless it is authorized by law.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would require DOR, and allows affected taxpayers, to notify the chairpersons of the Senate Finance committee, House Ways and Means committee or their successor committees if a newly proposed interpretation or application of any provision of Title 42 or 43 will adversely affect taxpayers prospectively, before the adoption of a new interpretation or application, require DOR to testify regarding the reasons why the new interpretation or application is necessary if the chairpersons of the Senate Finance committee, House Ways and Means committee or their successor committees hold a hearing on the new interpretation's or application's impact on taxpayers, and contains a legislative intent clause.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to turn the Legislature's standard for tax laws into an enforceable rule. It would require DOR, and allows affected taxpayers, to notify the chairpersons of the Senate Finance committee, House Ways and Means committee or their successor committees if a newly proposed interpretation or application of any provision of Title 42 or 43 will adversely affect taxpayers prospectively, before the adoption of a new interpretation or application, and would also require DOR to testify regarding the reasons why the new interpretation or application is necessary if the chairpersons of the Senate Finance committee, House Ways and Means committee or their successor committees hold a hearing on the new interpretation's or application's impact on taxpayers, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2015

budget procedures; late filing penalty

2026 · Taxes & economy

HB2460

business property; theft; penalties; prohibition

2026 · Taxes & economy

SB1180

DOR; income tax forms; conformity

2026 · Taxes & economy

HB4138

2026-2027; general appropriations act.

2026 · Taxes & economy

HB4140

2026-2027; state budget implementation.

2026 · Taxes & economy

HB4141

capital outlay; 2026-2027; appropriations.

2026 · Taxes & economy