BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed April 11, 2023 · 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

HB2212

criminal damage; trespassing; critical facilities

BLAME HOBBS!

Public safety

THE CONTEXT: A person can commit aggravated criminal damage by intentionally or recklessly defacing, damaging or tampering with any utility infrastructure or property, construction site or existing structure for the purpose of obtaining nonferrous metals. This offense is classified as follows: 1) A class 3 felony if the person causes $10,000 or more in damages to the property; 2) A class 4 felony if the person causes $1,500 or more but less than $10,000 in damages to the property; and 3) A class 5 felony in all other cases.

WHAT THE BILL DID: of obtaining nonferrous metals. This offense is classified as follows: 1) A class 3 felony if the person causes $10,000 or more in damages to the property; 2) A class 4 felony if the person causes $1,500 or more but less than $10,000 in damages to the property; and 3) A class 5 felony in all other cases.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to make the public-safety rule for criminal damage clearer and more usable. It would imposes criminal liability for aggravated criminal damage if a person interferes with or prevents the performance of a normal function of utility infrastructure or property or the intended course or path of any utility service and classifies the offense as follows: a) A class 3 felony if the person causes $10,000 or more in damages to the property; b) A class 4 felony if the person causes $1,500 or more but less than $10,000 in damages to the property; and c) A class 5 felony in all other cases, and would also includes the cost of the loss of the utility service among other variables that must be considered in determining the amount of damage to property for purposes of aggravated criminal damage, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2802

fentanyl sales; manufacture; sentencing; testing

2023 · Public safety

SB1588

criminal justice data collection; system.

2023 · Public safety

HB2309

law enforcement; sovereign authority

2023 · Public safety

HB2617

carrying of firearms; constables

2023 · Public safety

HB2544

Arizona manufactured; modified firearms

2023 · Public safety

HB2667

disruption; educational institution; concealed weapon.

2023 · Public safety