BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed June 20, 2023 · 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

SB1151

community property; spousal maintenance; documentation

BLAME HOBBS!

Housing & property

THE CONTEXT: Arizona is what is commonly referred to as a community property state. This means that all property acquired by either spouse during a marriage, with some exceptions, is considered to be the community property of both spouses, and thus owned by each spouse in equal shares ( A.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would require a court that is assessing the value of a business interest to determine the community share to be paid to the spouse who will no longer maintain his or her interest in the business to assess the value of the business as of the date of service of the petition for dissolution, legal separation or annulment, unless the court determines another date would be more appropriate as the result an extreme market condition or the parties agree otherwise, specifies that, beginning on the date of service of the petition for dissolution, legal separation or annulment, the spouse who will no longer maintain an interest in the business interest is neither entitled to any share of the business's profits nor responsible for any new liabilities earned or incurred by the business after that date, and mandate that any compensation to the business owner that is included in the value of the business, as specified above, cannot be used for the purposes of calculating spousal maintenance or child support.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to turn the Legislature's standard for community property into an enforceable rule. It would require a court that is assessing the value of a business interest to determine the community share to be paid to the spouse who will no longer maintain his or her interest in the business to assess the value of the business as of the date of service of the petition for dissolution, legal separation or annulment, unless the court determines another date would be more appropriate as the result an extreme market condition or the parties agree otherwise, and would also specifies that, beginning on the date of service of the petition for dissolution, legal separation or annulment, the spouse who will no longer maintain an interest in the business interest is neither entitled to any share of the business's profits nor responsible for any new liabilities earned or incurred by the business after that date, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

HB2623

unclaimed property; information; registration

2023 · Housing & property

SB1413

homeless encampment; removal

2023 · Housing & property

HB2379

hotel; motel; vouchers; homeless; prohibition

2023 · Housing & property

HB2535

private property; wells; regulation; prohibition

2023 · Housing & property

SB1162

home-based businesses; restrictions; prohibition

2023 · Taxes & economy

SB1184

municipal tax exemption; residential leases

2023 · Taxes & economy