BLAMEHOBBS.COM
IssuesVeto LedgerVeto BlogReceipts

BLAMEHOBBS.COM

Share this page

NicoPAC
Political Advertisement
Paid for by NicoPAC

10% of funds from out-of-state contributors.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Sources include Arizona Legislature bill records, LegiScan session dumps, and published veto letters. Bill numbers cited throughout.

← The Veto Ledger

Vetoed May 13, 2025 · 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

SB1036

public resources; influencing elections; penalties

BLAME HOBBS!

Elections

THE CONTEXT: Statute prohibits this state and its political subdivisions, including cities, towns, counties, agencies, special taxing districts and persons acting on behalf of a school district, from spending or using the entities resources, which includes all things of value, to influence the outcome of an election. The Attorney General or county attorney is authorized to initiate a suit in the superior court to enforce any alleged violation of the previously mentioned prohibition.

WHAT THE BILL DID: The final vetoed version would authorize a resident, in addition to the Attorney General and county attorney, to initiate a suit in superior court to enforce prohibitions relating to the state, a political subdivision of the state, a school district or a special taxing district attempting to unlawfully influence the outcome of an election, specifies that the civil penalties, awarded based off of the violation of statutes relating to unlawfully influencing the outcome of an election, must be paid in an action filed by: a) the Attorney General to the Office of the Attorney General; b) the county attorney to the office of the county treasurer; or c) a resident to the resident, and alters the definition of influencing the outcomes of elections.

WHY IT MATTERED: The practical reason for this bill was to give Arizonans and public officials a defined option for public resources under state law. It would authorize a resident, in addition to the Attorney General and county attorney, to initiate a suit in superior court to enforce prohibitions relating to the state, a political subdivision of the state, a school district or a special taxing district attempting to unlawfully influence the outcome of an election, and would also specifies that the civil penalties, awarded based off of the violation of statutes relating to unlawfully influencing the outcome of an election, must be paid in an action filed by: a) the Attorney General to the Office of the Attorney General; b) the county attorney to the office of the county treasurer; or c) a resident to the resident, rather than leave the current rule unchanged.

Legislature recordOfficial bill summaryVeto letter

Share this page

Related vetoes

SB1001

early ballots; identification; tabulation

2025 · Elections

HB2206

multistate voter registration system; prohibition

2025 · Elections

HB2767

voter registrations; transportation department; recorders

2025 · Elections

SB1097

elections; voting centers; polling places

2025 · Elections

SB1052

voter registration; temporary absence

2025 · Elections

SB1091

school districts; bonds; overrides; ballots

2025 · Elections